Preservative efficacy testing

Cosmetics challenge test

The Challenge Test, also known as the Preservative Efficacy Test (PET), evaluates whether the preservative system of a cosmetic product is capable of protecting it against microbial contamination throughout its intended shelf life and normal consumer use. The study provides evidence that the product remains microbiologically safe after repeated exposure during manufacturing, storage and use.

Challenge test is an important part of the Product information file, and reference to it must be made in the cosmetic product safety report (CPSR). According to ISO 29621, every cosmetic manufacturer has to ensure that the product, as purchased, is free from the numbers and types of microorganisms that could affect product quality and consumer health, as well as to ensure that microorganisms introduced during normal product use will not adversely affect the quality or safety of the product. The latter can be ensured by performing the cosmetics challenge test.

Cosmetics challenge test
ISO 11930:2019 / USP 51Preservative efficacy testing
Testing procedure

How is the cosmetics challenge test performed?

Challenge test procedure

We perform preservative efficacy testing according to internationally recognised standards, including:

  • ISO 11930
  • USP 51

The test is based on the monitoring of the presence of various pathogens in the cosmetic product when it is produced, followed by the intentional inoculation of a cosmetic product with five different strains of microorganisms:

  • Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive bacterium)
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa (gram-negative bacterium)
  • Candida albicans (fungus)
  • Escherichia coli (gram-negative bacterium)
  • Aspergillus brasiliensis (fungus)

The remaining concentration of these microorganisms is then determined after 7, 14 and 28 days. The product is considered to pass the preservative efficacy test if the concentrations of the fungi do not increase over the testing period and if the concentrations of the bacteria are reduced sufficiently by day 14 and do not increase from that time until the end of the test.

Recommendations

When is a challenge test recommended?

Scenarios requiring a challenge test
  • New product development
  • Reformulation
  • Change of preservative system
  • Packaging changes
  • Shelf-life extension
  • Change of manufacturing process
Exemptions

When is a cosmetics challenge test not needed?

Challenge test exemptions

A cosmetics challenge test is not required for certain types of cosmetic products. Microbiologically low-risk products can be exempt from the preservative efficacy test, because, due to the product characteristics, the likelihood of microbiological contamination for such products is very low or even non-existent. The product characteristics that define products as microbiologically low-risk products are described in ISO 29621:2017 and can be divided into characteristics due to the composition of the product, characteristics that are a consequence of the production conditions, packaging or combined factors.

These characteristics are as follows:

  • Water activity of formulation: products that do not contain water
  • The pH of the formulation: highly acidic (pH below 3) or highly alkaline (pH above 10) products
  • Alcohol content: products with more than 20% alcohol concentration
  • Formulation with raw materials that can create a hostile environment: such as strong oxidizing agents, polar organic solvents, oxidizing dyes, aluminium chlorohydrate and related salts or propellant gases
  • Production conditions: if containers are filled at more than 65 degrees Celsius
  • Packaging types: product packaged in pressurized containers, pump dispensers or single-dose units
  • A combination of the above-mentioned factors

Any lack of challenge test, however, must be duly justified.

Cosmetics challenge test

FAQ

Timeline

Testing timelines

01

Day 0

The product is inoculated with the challenge microorganisms, and the initial concentration is determined to establish the starting level.

02

Day 7

The surviving microorganisms are enumerated and compared with the Day 0 count to determine the log reduction.

03

Day 14

Enumeration is repeated and the reduction is calculated.

04

Day 28

Final enumeration is performed, and the preservative system is assessed against the standard acceptance criteria.

Client reviews

Trusted by 1000+ cosmetic brands worldwide.

Pulled from verified Google reviews — independent, unedited, and updated continuously.

"Pharmaplast began to work with CE.way almost one year ago. CE.way is our cosmetics consultant who look after compilation of PIF, safety assessments and CPNP notifications. Working with CE.way has been a joy so far. Their replies are very swift and Mr Tadej is very cooperative, helpful and with a deep knowledge about the cosmetics regulations."
MP
Mena
Pharmaplast · Egypt
"We were looking for a stand-alone service, not too sure what to expect... The professionalism, the assistance and the responsiveness were very much appreciated, amongst the best we have ever experienced."
CA
Carol
Alpure · Switzerland
"We are a small manufacturing company located in the US. We recently used CE.way Regulatory Consultants to help guide us through the Cosmetic regulatory changes that have taken place in the EU. They were instrumental in helping us understand the new laws and streamline the entire process. I would highly recommend their services."
LI
Lena & Clay
IBP · USA
1 / 5
Get started

Ready to validate your cosmetic product's preservative system?

Speak with our regulatory experts about challenge testing, preservative efficacy evaluation, and EU market compliance requirements.

WhatsAppViber